I embed with your team as a part-time engineering leader, setting technical direction, improving code quality, and helping you build faster without breaking things.
I act as your on-demand CTO, setting architecture direction, leading technical hiring, and shipping product, without the full-time cost. Two retainer plans: Advisor (async strategic anchor) from €300/mo, or Builder (embedded delivery partner) from €2,000/mo.
Two monthly retainers. Pick the one that matches who's actually shipping.
A team's output for the price of one senior engineer.
I build with an AI agent stack I've refined for over a year, Claude Opus 4.7 orchestrating a Sonnet worker swarm. That leverage is why a flat retainer here ships far more than the headline price suggests.
What you're buying: shipped outcomes and speed, a predictable monthly fee, a transparent summary of everything delivered, and no timesheets. You pay for results, not hours.
Need a specific thing built, not an ongoing retainer? A scoped build, delivered by a Claude-leveraged team, the same project priced by how fast you need it, paid per milestone. (Inside a Builder retainer, a Rush turnaround is a priority conversation, not a separate price.)
Lead with this
Rush
from €14,000
paid per milestone · 3 × ~€4,700
Fastest delivery, prioritized above everything else, for launches, fundraises, and hard deadlines.
Standard
from €8,000
paid per milestone · 2 × ~€4,000
A firm, realistic date. The right call for most projects.
Relaxed
from €5,600
paid in one milestone of €5,600
No firm fast date, built around everything else at a patient pace, for the lowest price.
Prices shown for a Full-MVP build. Configure your project → to size it and see your offer.
Indicative pricing, provisional while I calibrate from the first quotes.
I sit in on planning, set the architecture direction with your team, and make the boring-but-load-bearing decisions early, language, framework, hosting, build pipeline, infra boundaries, so you don't have to revisit them six months in. Buy-vs-build calls get answered with a real cost model, not a gut feel.
Quarterly roadmap reviews aligned to business goals and engineering capacity
Architecture decision records (ADRs) for any choice that's expensive to reverse
Technology selection with explicit trade-off documentation
Buy-vs-build evaluations with TCO and time-to-value baked in
Code Quality & Architecture
I review pull requests, pair with your developers, and refactor the parts of the codebase that are slowing the team down. The goal is to leave your engineers more capable, not just to ship better code on my watch, patterns get written down, conventions get enforced in the linter, and the next hire ramps faster.
Code review cadence + PR-author feedback that builds the team's senior judgment
Targeted refactors of high-traffic areas (auth, data layer, rendering hot paths)
Architectural patterns documented and enforced in code (lint, tests, CI)
Technical debt triage, what to fix now, what to absorb, what to leave alone
Team Management
Building the team that matches your stage, and reshaping it when the stage changes. I help you scope roles, design interview loops that actually predict on-the-job performance, and run hiring at a pace your existing team can absorb. When restructures are needed, I run them with care, performance conversations, role realignment, and graceful exits.
Role design and leveling, engineer, senior, staff, lead boundaries that hold up
Interview loop design with calibrated rubrics, take-homes, and live coding
Onboarding playbooks that get new hires shipping in week 2, not month 2
Restructures, performance plans, and graceful offboarding, handled directly
Transparent Communication
Stakeholders get the honest version, including the parts that are hard to hear. Engineering communication that earns trust over time looks like clear weekly progress, named risks, and explicit trade-offs. No theater, no euphemisms when something is behind, no surprise escalations to the board.
Weekly progress reports written in plain English, optimised for decision-makers
Named risks with owners, mitigations, and dates, not buried in a slide deck
Honest estimates including the uncertainty band, not the optimistic floor
Direct escalation path to founders / board with no filtering or spin
12+
Years experience
37+
Projects delivered
150M+
Users impacted
30+
Companies served
Engineering range
A self-rated snapshot of where I bring the most leverage, Football Manager style, scored out of 20.
Android (Kotlin, Compose) 10+ years, primary expertise
20/20
Architecture & Tech Strategy
18/20
AI/ML & LLM Integration Claude API, agent systems
17/20
Team Leadership & Mentoring
17/20
Backend (Node, Python, APIs)
16/20
DevOps & CI/CD
14/20
Frontend (React, Next.js, Astro)
14/20
iOS (SwiftUI)
12/20
≥18 expert
15–17 strong
<15 working knowledge
About Fractional CTO
What is a fractional CTO?
A fractional CTO provides part-time engineering leadership, strategy, architecture, hiring, and team management, without the cost of a full-time executive. You get senior experience applied to the problems that matter most, on a schedule that fits your budget.
How does pricing work?
Engagements run on a flat monthly retainer, not an hourly meter. Pick Advisor (€300/mo, async-first strategic anchor, one strategic call a month plus async support) or Builder (from €2,000/mo, embedded delivery partner, in three flat tiers). You're buying a predictable monthly outcome, not a timesheet.
What's the difference between Advisor and Builder?
Advisor is for teams that have their own developers and want a senior strategic anchor, one strategic call per month plus async support, with 50% off every productized service. Builder is for teams that need delivery, an embedded partner shipping a steady stream of product work, in three flat monthly tiers (Core €2,000, Plus €4,000, Max €6,000), with productized services like Code Review and the Scalable MVP Sprint absorbed into the retainer instead of charged separately.
What if I'm not sure which Builder tier I need?
Start at Builder Core (€2,000/mo). Most teams move one tier up to Plus (€4,000/mo) after the first month, once we both see the real pace. You can resize between tiers month to month with no penalty. If you mostly need strategic guidance rather than hands-on delivery, the Advisor plan (€300/mo) is the better fit.
How is a flat retainer fair if my needs vary month to month?
Each tier is sized for a typical month at that level, so light and heavy months even out. The flat fee buys availability and a predictable budget, not a metered ledger. If you consistently need more than your tier delivers, we move you up a tier; a single busy month is simply absorbed.
How do you deliver so much for the price?
I build with an AI agent stack, Claude Opus 4.7 orchestrating a Sonnet worker swarm, that I've refined for over a year. That leverage means each retainer ships far more than a single senior engineer could at the same price. You're paying for shipped outcomes and speed, not for hours on a clock.
How exactly do you bill within the retainer?
One flat monthly fee, billed up front for the month, that's the whole invoice. At the end of each month you get a transparent summary of everything shipped, so you can see exactly what the retainer delivered. No timesheets, no line-item hourly charges, no surprise overages.
What industries do you work with?
I focus on mobile-first companies (Android in particular), SaaS, and startups with an established app or platform. Industries I find most interesting: extreme sports, motorsports, music, and high-end fashion, but I evaluate all opportunities on merit.
What does your engagement process look like?
We start with a free 15-minute discovery call. If there's a fit, I do a paid technical audit to understand your codebase, team, and goals. From there you pick a plan on the Advisor or Builder intake page and we begin. Advisor has a 3-month upfront minimum; Builder is month-to-month with two weeks notice.
How is this different from hiring a full-time CTO?
A full-time CTO costs $200–400K/year in salary plus equity (US market data; EU rates run ~70–80% of these figures). A fractional engagement gives you the same calibre of leadership for a fraction of the cost, with no hiring risk. It's the right choice when you need senior guidance but aren't ready to justify a full-time hire.
Do you write code, or is it purely strategic?
Both. I'm hands-on by default, I review PRs, write production code, and pair with your developers. Pure strategy without execution is rarely useful. The Advisor plan leans strategic; the Builder plan leans delivery. Both include some of each.
Ready to strengthen your engineering team?
Start with a free 15-minute discovery call. No commitment, no pitch deck, just an honest conversation about your team and your goals.